The Signal Hill

Signal Hill is an advocate for human rights that provides information on life issues, women's health and family support.

The Signal Hill The Signal Hill

"The research provides many negative consequences of parental cohabitation for children. The opposite occurs for children whose parents are married… The conclusion from these various reviews is that children benefit unequivocally from their parents’ marriage."

~Dr. Anne-Marie Ambert, Marriage & Cohabitation, the Vanier Institute of the Family.~

Cohabitation & Children

The Signal Hill

  1. In 2001, 8.2% of Canadian children aged 0 to 14 lived in common-law households—excluding Quebec where 29% lived in such households. When Quebec is included, the Canadian rate jumps to 13% of all children aged 0 to 14. (1)
  2. LeBourdais et al. (2)estimated that Quebec children whose parents are still cohabiting are three times more likely to experience a parental separation than those whose parents are married (compared to over four times for the remainder of Canadian children).(3)
  3. Children who begin life within a married two-parent family experience fewer parental marital transitions: two in three will remain with their parents. In contrast, children who begin life in a cohabitational family are more likely to experience their parents’ separation and may also experience more re-partnering than do children of divorce. (4)
  4. "The research provides many negative consequences of parental cohabitation for children. The opposite occurs for children whose parents are married. As well, elsewhere, I have reviewed the impact on children of divorce and of living in one-parent families"(5) The conclusion from these various reviews is that children benefit unequivocally from their parents’ marriage.(6)
  5. Compared to children of married biological parents, children age 12-17 with cohabiting parents are six times more likely to exhibit emotional and behavioral problems.(7)

Excerpt of young woman in a cohabitating relationship.

Dr. Ambert collected over 1,500 autobiographies from students dating back to 1974.(8) She writes "this student’s quote speaks more of disadvantages. It is indeed remarkable that, in the many autobiographies of cohabiting women students, I have been unable to find material that was unequivocally favourable to this lifestyle."(9)

"Right now I’d rate myself as being fairly unhappy and it’s because I have found out that my boyfriend I live with lives with me just so that he can have sex that he knows is safe. He does love me some you know but his kind of love is mainly sexual. That means that I have wasted the past 18 months of my life that I could have better spent looking for a better guy and also one that would have accepted me as a whole person and not just as a sex machine..."

 

Footnotes:

1. Ambert A.M., 2005, Cohabitation & Marriage: How are they related? Contemporary Family Trends, The Vanier Institute of the Family, Ottawa

2. Le Bourdais, C., Neill, G., and Marcil-Gratton, N. 2000b. L'effet du type d'union sur la stabilite des familles dites "intactes." Recherches sociographiques, 41, 53-74.)

3. Ambert A.M., 2005, Cohabitation & Marriage: How are they related? Contemporary Family Trends, The Vanier Institute of the Family, Ottawa

4. Schwartz, S.J., and Finley, G.E. 2005. The long reach of divorce: Divorce and child well-being across three generations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 207-215. Ambert A.M., 2005, Cohabitation & Marriage: How are they related? Contemporary Family Trends, The Vanier Institute of the Family, Ottawa

5. Ambert, A.-M. 2005c. Divorce: Facts, causes, and consequences (3rd ed.). Ottawa: Vanier Institute of the Family. Ambert, A.-M. 2002a. One-parent families. Part 1: Characteristics and consequences. Ambert, A.-M. 2002b. One-parent families. Part 2: Causes and issues of rights and responsibilities

6. Waite, L.J., and Gallagher, M. 2000. The case for marriage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

7. Booth, A., Crouter, A.C., eds., Just Living Together: Implications of Cohabitation on Families, Children and Social Policy, 2002

8. Ambert, A.-M. 2005. Changing families: Relationships in context. Toronto: PearsonEd. p26-27

9. Ambert A.M., 2005, Cohabitation & Marriage: How are they related? Contemporary Family Trends, The Vanier Institute of the Family, Ottawa

Resource Images